All he had was a straw-man argument."
Because you can't bowl a 300 and lose.
Because his arguments against scrutiny.
This job isn't for everyone, but hay...it's in my jeans"
He was *out standing* in his field.
The game where players make enough money to risk getting brain damage, or the debate where the players already have brain damage?
Because when their opponent makes a point, they always respond with a valid counterpoint.
